That's what you think. You have your right to look at that way. However, I have my right to comprehend at the same story differently.
''In legal terminology, we call it the fruit of a poisoned tree. The fruit will undoubtedly get poisoned as long as the tree has already been poisoned,'' Thaksin said.
The most logical thing to justify this event is by reversing the situation. If Marc wins the next general election and somehow get kicked out by military coup, of course, from Thaksin side. Later, the coup also appoints a number of investigating committee to handle Marc and Suthep guild for murdering 99 people or Marc military desertion. At the end, suppose court said "guilty as charge". Will Marc ever accept that?
Solving a problem by making an exception just create more complex problems. By accepting military coup, you did make an exception. Yes you did. Why that coup does not get any punishment? Between ripping off the constitution by tank and corruption on buy/sell properties which one look more evil. For me, Thaksin has full right to refuse everything, because you have no right to kick him out in the first place.
Are you daring enough for reopening all Thaksin cases after we have a new constitution by real Thai people without military coup shadow? If court still says guilty, I can accept that and will blame him as well.
Which one is more pathetic between the guy who was kicked out by force and keep fighting back in every possible way to reclaim his right and the other one who sit comfortably ring side and can simply should "guilty" from time to time. Which one is coward?
That's what you think. You have your right to look at that way. However, I have my right to comprehend at the same story differently.
''In legal terminology, we call it the fruit of a poisoned tree. The fruit will undoubtedly get poisoned as long as the tree has already been poisoned,'' Thaksin said.
The most logical thing to justify this event is by reversing the situation. If Marc wins the next general election and somehow get kicked out by military coup, of course, from Thaksin side. Later, the coup also appoints a number of investigating committee to handle Marc and Suthep guild for murdering 99 people or Marc military desertion. At the end, suppose court said "guilty as charge". Will Marc ever accept that?
Solving a problem by making an exception just create more complex problems. By accepting military coup, you did make an exception. Yes you did. Why that coup does not get any punishment? Between ripping off the constitution by tank and corruption on buy/sell properties which one look more evil. For me, Thaksin has full right to refuse everything, because you have no right to kick him out in the first place.
Are you daring enough for reopening all Thaksin cases after we have a new constitution by real Thai people without military coup shadow? If court still says guilty, I can accept that and will blame him as well.
Which one is more pathetic between the guy who was kicked out by force and keep fighting back in every possible way to reclaim his right and the other one who sit comfortably ring side and can simply should "guilty" from time to time. Which one is coward?
